Celebrity

Depp claims Heard ‘doctored’ black eye

Johnny Depp has gained a courtroom bid to entry Amber Heard’s cellphone, as he accused his ex-wife of modifying her images to appear to be she’d been assaulted.

A courtroom has given Johnny Depp entry to his ex-wife Amber Heard’s cellphone – which he hopes will show she faked accidents he allegedly gave her.

The Pirates of the Caribbean star – who’s waging a $68 million libel suit against Heard – claims she doctored images purporting to indicate her with two black eyes, which she says she suffered in 2015 by the hands of the actor.

“Ms Heard’s counsel has repeatedly used these phony photographs at deposition,” Depp’s lawyer Benjamin Chew alleged to the Circuit Courtroom of Fairfax County in Virginia in a courtroom submitting.

Depp, 58, is suing Heard, 35, in Virginia over a 2019 op-ed in The Washington Post by the Aquaman actress, wherein she wrote about home violence – however which he believes was a libellous assault on him.

Although she by no means talked about Depp’s identify within the article, Heard has elsewhere claimed that she suffered two black eyes, a damaged nostril and a damaged lip at his palms throughout a 2015 assault in Los Angeles, with images of the alleged accidents revealed world wide.

Web Search Engine

Mr Chew, nevertheless, claims that when the LAPD responded to the alleged beating “they found no injury upon Ms Heard and no disruption to the penthouses”.

“Ms Heard and her friends then fabricated photos that she used to obtain an ex parte TRO [temporary restraining order] and a $7 million ($AU9.5 million) divorce settlement which Ms Heard falsely testified in London she gave to the ACLU and, more scandalously, to the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles; sick children with cancer,” Mr Chew alleged in his submitting.

He added that the LAPD “disavowed the photographs” and “said they did not depict what they saw”.

The Virginia courtroom dominated on Wednesday that Depp’s staff can have an professional take a look at the cellphone and see if they’ll discover proof of any picture tampering.

Mr Chew had argued that earlier photos given to Depp’s authorized staff got here with none metadata, so their professional, Brian Neumeister, couldn’t confirm the main points.

“Mr Neumeister’s preliminary investigation shows that a number of the photographs have been run through a photo – a photo editing application called Photo 3 that can easily manipulate images such as showing bruises where none actually existed,” stated Mr Chew.

In November 2020, Depp lost his libel case against the UK’s The Sun newspaper over an article that known as him a “wife beater.”

The decide, Mr Justice Nicol, stated The Solar had proved that what was within the article was “substantially true” and located that 12 of the 14 alleged incidents of home violence had occurred.

In March, Depp was refused permission to enchantment in opposition to the ruling.

Nonetheless, in his new Virginia courtroom submitting, Mr Chew argued that The Solar’s personal professional concluded that Heard’s pictures that confirmed accidents to her face from December 2015 “were manipulated three years later”.

He stated the professional discovered that images from an iPad Professional 10.5 have been created on or after October 6, 2018, including: “As such, any editing of the trial bundle versions would have been on or after October 6, 2018.

“So Ms Heard or someone on her behalf doctored those photographs three years later. When that came up in her testimony in London, Ms Heard falsely denied it. In short, Your Honor, without forensic imaging Mr Neumeister cannot properly assess or verify Ms Heard’s data,” he claimed.

The courtroom was informed she appeared on James Corden’s chat present the day after the alleged assault – with Heard claiming she was carrying heavy make-up to cover the bruising.

Within the December 2019 op-ed on the coronary heart of the lawsuit, Heard – who was married to the actor from 2015 to 2017 – wrote that she had “become a public figure representing domestic abuse”.

Depp’s identify isn’t talked about, however the piece was extensively interpreted as being about him. The actress wrote that she “felt the full force of our culture’s wrath for women who speak out”.

In response, Depp’s lawyer Adam Waldman stated the column was an “abuse of the #MeToo movement” and claimed Heard “masquerades as victim rather than abuser”.

The go well with claims that Depp has suffered monetary losses due to the accusations, together with being dropped from his position as Captain Jack Sparrow within the Pirates of the Caribbean movies.

The decide on Wednesday additionally denied that Depp ought to have at hand over his cellphone and laptop computer, saying Heard’s attorneys had requested for “too broad” a search.

Heard’s lawyer Elaine Bredehoft informed Web page Six that Heard, “welcomes the opportunity to present her evidence in a trial by jury, in a court of law” subsequent 12 months – whereas claiming that Depp and his authorized staff try to attempt the case by way of the media.

“This is a dirty strategy (after having been found to have committed multiple significant acts of domestic violence against Amber Heard) by Mr Depp’s legal team, to present false claims while avoiding accusations of defamation because of judicial immunity,” Ms Bredehoft stated.

“While legal hearings are protected from defamation, they are not protected from leaks to the press, which is exactly Mr Depp’s intention – even though he lost every one of these arguments in the UK trial – his first choice of forum – he is trying to interject out-of-context and already proven to be false pieces from his unsuccessful efforts in court to attempt to deceive the public, pretending these issues have not already been fully tried, in his court of choice, where he lost.

“Now, in yet another court of law, he is unable to submit his own evidence because he has nothing to prove his claims.”

This text initially appeared on NY Post and was reproduced with permission

Initially revealed as Johnny Depp wins bid to access Amber Heard’s phone to prove she ‘faked’ assault photos

Artmotion U.S.A

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button